Proctor
Proctor v. Vishay Intertchnolog
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 9, 200907-16527California10,924 words
Opinion
Opinion
Berzon, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
REBECCA PROCTOR; REX BROOKS;
JOHN DONOVAN; ROBERT NEEDLES
on behalf of Siliconix, Inc. themselves and on behalf of all minority shareholders of Siliconix, Inc., similarly situated, No. 07-16527 Plaintiff-Appellant, v. D.C. No.
CV-06-04134-JF
VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY INC.;
OPINION
VISHAY TEMIC SEMICONDUCTOR
ACQUISITION HOLDINGS
CORPORATION; SILICONIX, INC.;
ERNST & YOUNG LLP; FELIX D.
ZANDMAN,
Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeremy D. Fogel, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 10, 2009—San Francisco, California
Filed October 9, 2009
Before: David R. Thompson, Marsha S. Berzon, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Berzon
14495 PROCTOR v. VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY 14499
COUNSEL
Maxwell M. Blecher and James Robert Noblin, Los Angeles, California, and James A. Hennefer, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiffs-appellants. 14500 PROCTOR v. VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY Peter A. Wald and David M. Friedman, San Francisco, Cali- fornia, and…