Proctor

Proctor v. Vishay Intertchnolog

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 9, 200907-16527California10,924 words

Opinion

Opinion

Berzon, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

REBECCA PROCTOR; REX BROOKS; 

JOHN DONOVAN; ROBERT NEEDLES

on behalf of Siliconix, Inc. themselves and on behalf of all minority shareholders of Siliconix, Inc., similarly situated, No. 07-16527 Plaintiff-Appellant, v.  D.C. No.

CV-06-04134-JF

VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY INC.;

OPINION

VISHAY TEMIC SEMICONDUCTOR

ACQUISITION HOLDINGS

CORPORATION; SILICONIX, INC.;

ERNST & YOUNG LLP; FELIX D.

ZANDMAN,

Defendants-Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeremy D. Fogel, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 10, 2009—San Francisco, California

Filed October 9, 2009

Before: David R. Thompson, Marsha S. Berzon, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Berzon

14495 PROCTOR v. VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY 14499

COUNSEL

Maxwell M. Blecher and James Robert Noblin, Los Angeles, California, and James A. Hennefer, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiffs-appellants. 14500 PROCTOR v. VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY Peter A. Wald and David M. Friedman, San Francisco, Cali- fornia, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.