Atsu Acolatse v. Michael Astrue

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 7, 201311-17563California654 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 07 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ATSU OSSA ACOLATSE, No. 11-17563

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 5:10-cv-02024-LHK

v.

MEMORANDUM *

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Lucy Koh, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 26, 2012 **

Before: HUG, FARRIS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

Atsu Acolatse appeals pro se from a judgment of the district court affirming

the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for disability

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We review de novo a district court’s judgment upholding the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.