Napier

Crockett & Myers v. Napier

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 21, 200907-16191California3,201 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CROCKETT & MYERS, LTD.; J. R. 

CROCKETT, Jr., Plaintiffs-counter-defendants- Appellees, No. 07-16191 v.  D.C. No.

CV-05-00877-PMP-

NAPIER, FITZGERALD & KIRBY, LLP; GWF

BRIAN P. FITZGERALD,

Defendants-counter-claimants- Appellants. 

CROCKETT & MYERS, LTD.; J. R. 

CROCKETT, Jr., Plaintiffs-counter-defendants- No. 07-16534 Appellants, D.C. No. v.  CV-05-00877-PMP-

NAPIER, FITZGERALD & KIRBY, LLP; GWF

BRIAN P. FITZGERALD, OPINION

Defendants-counter-claimants- Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 16, 2009 Submission Withdrawn April 27, 2009 San Francisco, California

Filed October 21, 2009

14157 14158 CROCKETT & MYERS v. NAPIER Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Marsha S. Berzon and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge D.W. Nelson CROCKETT & MYERS v. NAPIER 14161

COUNSEL

Mark A. Hutchison, Scott A. Flinders…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.