Doe
Ca Energy Commission v. Doe
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 200907-71576California5,850 words
Opinion
Opinion
Canby, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION,
Petitioner, v. No. 07-71576
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY,
Respondent, DOE No.
EE-RM-PET-100
THE ASSOCIATION OF HOME OPINION
APPLIANCE MANUFACTURERS,
Respondent-Intervenor. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Department of Energy
Argued and Submitted November 17, 2008—San Francisco, California
Filed October 28, 2009
Before: William C. Canby, Jr. and Kim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges, and David G. Trager,* District Judge.
Opinion by Judge Canby
*The Honorable David G. Trager, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.
14565 CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION v. DOE 14569
COUNSEL
Jonathan Blees, Assistant Chief Counsel, Sacramento, Cali- fornia, for the petitioner.
H. Thomas Byron, III, Civil Division, United States Depart- ment of Justice, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.
Charles A. Samuels, Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, PC, Washington, D.C., for the intervenor-respondent.