United States v. Adrick Ruckes

Good Law
586 F.3d 713·2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 24578
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 9, 200908-30088California2,746 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tallman, J.

Adrick Ruckes (“Ruekes”) was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm and possessing cocaine base with the in tent to distribute following a search of his automobile. He moved to suppress the evidence discovered during that search: a 9mm handgun and over six grams of crack cocaine. After an evidentiary hearing, Judge Franklin D. Burgess of the Western District of Washington denied his motion.

Ruckes entered a conditional guilty plea and filed this timely appeal. He maintains that Washington State Trooper Kenyon Wiley’s search was not valid incident to his arrest because he was not arrested until after contraband was located within the vehicle. Following the district court’s analysis, the government proffers two alternative theories for upholding the conviction. First, it argues that the search was proper because, under New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 , 101 S.Ct. 2860 , 69 L.Ed.2d 768 (1981), when officers have probable cause to effect a full custodial arrest of a vehicle’s recent occupant, a search of the passenger compartment of the vehicle is warranted. Second, to the extent the search was not incident to Ruekes’s arrest, the firearm and cocaine would have been…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.