Phillips

Phillips v. Hust

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 2, 200904-36021California3,306 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANK MARVIN PHILLIPS,  No. 04-36021 Plaintiff-Appellee, v.  D.C. No.

CV-01-01252-ALH

LYNN HUST, Library Staff,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.  On Remand From The Supreme Court of the United States

Filed December 2, 2009

Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.*

Opinion by Judge O’Scannlain

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

15745 PHILLIPS v. HUST 15747

COUNSEL

John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General, and Rolf C. Moan, Supreme Court Coordinator, Salem, Oregon, filed the post-Supreme Court remand brief for the appellant. 15748 PHILLIPS v. HUST Frank Marvin Phillips, pro se, Salem, Oregon, filed the brief for the appellee.

OPINION

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We consider whether a prison librarian is entitled to quali- fied immunity from suit alleging a constitutional tort for hin- dering an inmate’s ability to comb-bind a petition for a writ of certiorari to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.