Phillips
Phillips v. Hust
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FRANK MARVIN PHILLIPS, No. 04-36021 Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.C. No.
CV-01-01252-ALH
LYNN HUST, Library Staff,
OPINION
Defendant-Appellant. On Remand From The Supreme Court of the United States
Filed December 2, 2009
Before: Dorothy W. Nelson, Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.*
Opinion by Judge O’Scannlain
*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
15745 PHILLIPS v. HUST 15747
COUNSEL
John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General, and Rolf C. Moan, Supreme Court Coordinator, Salem, Oregon, filed the post-Supreme Court remand brief for the appellant. 15748 PHILLIPS v. HUST Frank Marvin Phillips, pro se, Salem, Oregon, filed the brief for the appellee.
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We consider whether a prison librarian is entitled to quali- fied immunity from suit alleging a constitutional tort for hin- dering an inmate’s ability to comb-bind a petition for a writ of certiorari to the…