United States v. Kevin Curtin

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 4, 200908-10394California2,839 words

Opinion

Opinion

Trott, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA  No. 08-10394 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  2:04-cr-00064-KJD-

KEVIN ERIC CURTIN, PAL-

Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Kent J. Dawson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 25, 2009*

Filed December 4, 2009

Before: J. Clifford Wallace, Stephen S. Trott, and Pamela Ann Rymer, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Trott

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

15891 15894 UNITED STATES v. CURTIN

COUNSEL

Jason F. Carr, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, Nevada, for the defendant-appellant.

Adam M. Flake, United States Attorney’s Office, Las Vegas, Nevada, for the plaintiff-appellee.

OPINION

TROTT, Circuit Judge:

Kevin Eric Curtin stands convicted by a jury of (1) travel with intent to engage in a sexual act with a juvenile, in viola- tion of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b), and (2) one count of coercion and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.