Johnny McFarland v. Guardsmark, LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 9, 200908-16953California313 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHNNY MCFARLAND, on behalf of  himself and all others similarly No. 08-16953 situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,  D.C. No. 3:07-cv-03953-PJH v.

ORDER

GUARDSMARK, LLC,

Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 6, 2009* San Francisco, California

Filed December 9, 2009

Before: Procter Hug, Jr., Pamela Ann Rymer and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges.

COUNSEL

Daniel H. Qualls, Robin G. Workman, Qualls & Workman, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiff-appellant.

Martin D. Bern, Malcolm A. Heinicke, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, San Francisco, California; Fred A. Rowley, Jr.,

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

16015 16016 MCFARLAND v. GUARDSMARK Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, California, for the defendant-appellee.

ORDER

Johnny McFarland (“McFarland”) appeals from the district court’s decision denying his motion for partial summary judg- ment and granting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.