Johnny McFarland v. Guardsmark, LLC
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHNNY MCFARLAND, on behalf of himself and all others similarly No. 08-16953 situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:07-cv-03953-PJH v.
ORDER
GUARDSMARK, LLC,
Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 6, 2009* San Francisco, California
Filed December 9, 2009
Before: Procter Hug, Jr., Pamela Ann Rymer and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges.
COUNSEL
Daniel H. Qualls, Robin G. Workman, Qualls & Workman, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiff-appellant.
Martin D. Bern, Malcolm A. Heinicke, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, San Francisco, California; Fred A. Rowley, Jr.,
*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
16015 16016 MCFARLAND v. GUARDSMARK Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, California, for the defendant-appellee.
ORDER
Johnny McFarland (“McFarland”) appeals from the district court’s decision denying his motion for partial summary judg- ment and granting…