Perry

Perry v. Schwarzenegger

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 11, 200909-17241California408 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KRISTIN M. PERRY; SANDRA B. 

STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J.

ZARRILLO,

Plaintiffs-Appellees, and

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO,

Plaintiff-intervenor, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney

 General of California; MARK B. HORTON in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health & State Registrar of Vital Statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda; DEAN C. LOGAN, in his official capacity as Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles, Defendants, 

16727 16728 PERRY v. SCHWARZENEGGER

and 

DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH; GAIL J.

KNIGHT; MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ; No. 09-17241

HAK-SHING WILLIAM TAM; MARK

A. JANSSON; PROTECTMARRIAGE.

 D.C. No. 3:09-cv-02292-

COM-YES ON 8, A PROJECT OF …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.