Perry

Perry v. Schwarzenegger

Good Law
591 F.3d 1126·2010 WL 21191·2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 27316
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 11, 200909-17241, 09-17551California8,093 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fisher, J.

ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

The opinion filed December 11, 2009 is amended, and the amended opinion is filed concurrently with this Order.

The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc, and the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

Appellees’ petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc, filed December 24, 2009, is DENIED.

No further petitions for rehearing will be permitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

AMENDED OPINION

Proposition 8 amended the California Constitution to provide that only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California. Two same-sex couples filed this action in the district court alleging that Proposition 8 violates the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The official proponents of Proposition 8 (“Proponents”) intervened to defend the suit. Plaintiffs served a request for production of documents on Proponents, seeking, among other things, production of Proponents’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.