Peter Munoz, Jr. v. Gregory Smith
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 17, 201311-17904California566 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION APR 17 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PETER J. MUNOZ, Jr., No. 11-17904
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:11-cv-00197-LRH-
RAM
v.
GREGORY SMITH, Warden; MEMORANDUM *
NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 15, 2013 ** San Francisco, California
Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, O’SCANNLAIN and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
A habeas petitioner is entitled to equitable tolling of AEDPA’s one-year
statute of limitations if he shows “(1) that he has been pursuing his rights
* This disposition isn’t appropriate for publication and isn’t precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). page
diligently, and (2) that some extraordinary circumstance stood in his way and
prevented timely…