United States v. Michael Anchrum

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 30, 200909-30013California4,926 words

Opinion

Opinion

Tallman, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 09-30013 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  3:06-CR-00085-

MICHAEL DION ANCHRUM, TMB

Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 9, 2009* Seattle, Washington

Filed December 30, 2009

Before: Robert R. Beezer, Ronald M. Gould, and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Tallman

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

16847 16850 UNITED STATES v. ANCHRUM

COUNSEL

Michael D. Dieni, Esq., Assistant Federal Defender, Anchor- age, Alaska, for defendant-appellant Anchrum.

Christine M. Thoreson, Esq., Special Assistant United States Attorney, Anchorage, Alaska, for plaintiff-appellee United States of America. UNITED STATES v. ANCHRUM 16851

OPINION

TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:

Defendant-Appellant Michael Anchrum (“Anchrum”) appeals a jury conviction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.