United States v. Bernardo Mancinas-Flores

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 30, 200908-10094California8,295 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 08-10094 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.

BERNARDO MANCINAS-FLORES, AKA  CR-05-01086-ROS

ORDER AND

Arturo Morales-Garcia, AKA

AMENDED

Bernardo Mancias-Flores,

OPINION

Defendant-Appellant.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Roslyn O. Silver, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 5, 2009 San Francisco, California

Filed December 2, 2009 Amended December 30, 2009

Before: Pamela Ann Rymer and A. Wallace Tashima, Circuit Judges, and Lynn S. Adelman,* District Judge.

Opinion by Judge Adelman; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Rymer

*The Honorable Lynn S. Adelman, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, sitting by designation.

16783 UNITED STATES v. MANCINAS-FLORES 16787

COUNSEL

Daniel Kaplan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Phoenix, Arizona, for the defendant-appellant.

Lisa Jennis Settel, Assistant United States Attorney, Phoenix, Arizona, for the plaintiff-appellee.

ORDER

The opinion filed on December 2, 2009, is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.