Capener

United States v. Capener

Good Law
590 F.3d 1058·2010 WL 47358·2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 426
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 8, 201007-10359, 07-10372California5,820 words

Opinion

Opinion

Trager, J.

This case arises out of the failed prosecution of Dr. Mark Capener for health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1347 , mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341 and making false statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 . During the period relevant to this case, Dr. Capener was an otorhinolaryngologist in Nevada. The charges against him involved billing for surgeries that were allegedly either unnecessary, never performed or exaggerated for billing purposes (“upcoded”). After an extended investigation and a lengthy trial, the district court dismissed many of the counts against Capener on the ground that they were insufficiently supported by the evidence and the jury acquitted Capener of the remaining counts.

Following the trial, Capener moved for an award of fees to cover his defense costs under the Hyde Amendment, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A note, which allows an award of fees to a defendant when the prosecution acted in a manner that was “vexatious, frivolous, or in bad faith....” Id. The district court partially granted Capener’s motion, awarding fees to cover the costs of defending against certain counts associated with one of the theories advanced by the government on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.