Conn

Conn v. City of Reno

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 8, 201007-15572California12,814 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reinhardt COUNSEL, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHARLA CONN; DUSTIN CONN,  No. 07-15572 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v.  Cv-05-00595-HDM

CITY OF RENO; RYAN ASHTON; ORDER AND

DAVID ROBERTSON, AMENDED

Defendants-Appellees.  OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Howard D. McKibben, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted October 20, 2008—San Francisco, California

Filed July 24, 2009 Amended January 8, 2010

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Dorothy W. Nelson and Stephen Reinhardt, Circuit Judges.

Order; Dissent to Order by Chief Judge Kozinski’ Opinion by Judge Reinhardt COUNSEL

Terri Keyser-Cooper, Reno, Nevada, and Diane K. Vaillan- court, Santa Cruz, California, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

John J. Kadlic, Reno City Attorney, Donald L. Christensen, Deputy City Attorney, Reno, Nevada, for the defendants- appellees. 638 CONN v. CITY OF RENO

ORDER

The majority opinion filed July 24, 2009, slip op. 9581, and appearing at 572 F.3d 1047 (9th Cir. 2009), is hereby amended as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.