Mausali

United States v. Mausali

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 11, 201008-50062California1,971 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. Background

In May 2006, Special Agent John Carr of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, asked a confidential infor- 724 UNITED STATES v. MAUSALI mant to let him know if the informant came across any crews interested in committing a home invasion robbery. Carr hoped to infiltrate an existing robbery crew by portraying himself as a drug courier who intended to pay off thousands of dollars in gambling debts by fencing drugs stolen from his employ- er’s stash house. Within a few weeks, the informant put Carr in touch with Diego Osuna-Sanchez, who told Carr that he had an armed and experienced robbery crew interested in working with him. The crew consisted of Osuna-Sanchez, Juan Okamoto, Mokey Mose, and the defendant, Uiese Maus- ali.

Over the course of the next month, Carr met several times with Osuna-Sanchez, Okamoto, Mose, and Defendant to work out the details of the robbery; each member of the crew par- ticipated in the planning. On the morning of June 23, 2006, Okamoto, Mose, and Defendant met up with Carr at a ware- house parking lot to hash out the final details of the job on their way to the stash house. Before Okamoto, Mose, and Defendant could…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.