Crowe

Crowe v. County of San Diego

Good Law
593 F.3d 841·2010 WL 293758
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 14, 201005-55467, 05-56364, 05-55542, 05-56311California14,842 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thomas, J.

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

The opinion filed on January 14, 2010, 2010 WL 114956 , is hereby amended as follows. The paragraph beginning at the bottom of Slip. Op. page 1115 and continuing onto page 1116 is to be deleted and the following inserted.

We reverse the district court’s grant of summary judgment as to: (1) Michael and Aaron’s Fifth Amendment claims; (2) Michael and Aaron’s Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process claims; (3) all otherwise surviving Fourth Amendment claims against McDonough; (4) all otherwise surviving claims against Blum; (5) the Crowes’ deprivation of familial companionship claim based on Michael’s detention; (6) the Housers’ deprivation of familial companionship claim based on Aaron’s detention; and (7) all otherwise surviving claims against the Cities of Escondido and Oceanside. We affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment as to: (1) Aaron’s Fourth Amendment claim that police lacked probable cause to arrest him; (2) Michael’s Fourth Amendment claim that police lacked probable cause to arrest him; (3) Michael’s claim that police violated his Fourth Amendment rights by strip searching him; (4) Aaron’s Fourth Amendment claim that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.