Contreras

United States v. Contreras

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 2, 201008-50126California696 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 08-50126 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v.  2:06-cr-00353-

SJO-

KATIE SUE CONTRERAS, Seal F La Gorda, ORDER AND Defendant-Appellant.  OPINION

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California S. James Otero, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 2, 2010*

Filed February 2, 2010

Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, A. Wallace Tashima, Sidney R. Thomas, M. Margaret McKeown, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Richard R. Clifton, Jay S. Bybee, Consuelo M. Callahan, Carlos T. Bea, Milan D. Smith, Jr. and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion

*The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

1873 1874 UNITED STATES v. CONTRERAS

COUNSEL

Thomas P. O’Brien, United States Attorney, Los Angeles, California; George S. Cardona, Acting United States Attor- ney, Los Angeles, California; Christine C. Ewell, Daniel B. Levin and Michael J. Stern, Assistant United States Attor-…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.