United States v. Juan Lemus

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 18, 201008-50403California2,655 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 08-50403 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:07-cr-03238-

JUAN HERMAN LEMUS,  VQH-

Southern District of Defendant-Appellant. California, San Diego

 ORDER

Filed February 18, 2010

Before: Ronald M. Gould, Johnnie B. Rawlinson and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges.

Order; Dissent by Chief Judge Kozinski

ORDER

A judge of this court sua sponte called for this case to be reheard en banc. A vote was taken, and a majority of the active judges of the court did not vote for a rehearing en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f). The call for this case to be reheard en banc is DENIED.

Chief Judge KOZINSKI, with whom Judge PAEZ joins, dis- senting from the denial of rehearing en banc:

This is an extraordinary case: Our court approves, without blinking, a police sweep of a person’s home without a war-

2529 2530 UNITED STATES v. LEMUS rant, without probable cause, without reasonable suspicion and without exigency—in other words, with nothing at all to support the entry except the curiosity police…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.