Rutti

Rutti v. Lojack Corporation

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 2, 201007-56599California10,852 words

Opinion

Opinion

CALLAHAN, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIKE RUTTI, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, and

KEVIN VERMILLION; ISAAC

CHARLESWORTH; MURRAY M.

MYERS; DAN JOHNSTON; ORLANDO No. 07-56599 JASON WHITE; GICARDO LEAL; D.C. No.

PHILIP REDFIELD; JEROME CHARLES  CV-06-00350-DOC

WEISS; NICK KAMINSKY; MARCUS E. ORDER AND

MCKAY; RICHARD DEMELO; CHRIS OPINION

MEACHAM; ESHON D. MITCHELL,

Plaintiffs, v.

LOJACK CORPORATION, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 4, 2009—Pasadena, California

Filed March 2, 2010

Before: Cynthia Holcomb Hall, Barry G. Silverman and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.

3231 3232 RUTTI v. LOJACK CORP. Opinion by Judge Callahan;1 Separate Opinion by Judge Silverman; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Hall; Dissent by Judge Callahan

1 Judge Silverman joins in this opinion and Judge Hall joins in this opin- ion except as to Rutti’s claim for compensation…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.