Samayoa Lanuza v. Holder

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 5, 201007-71943California553 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELSA EMILIA SAMAYOA LANUZA; 

ELSA LOPEZ SAMAYOA, No. 07-71943 Petitioners, Agency Nos. v.  A070-643-822 ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney A073-972-112 General, OPINION Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 5, 2010* Pasadena, California

Filed March 5, 2010

Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges, and John W. Sedwick,** District Judge.

Per Curiam Opinion

*The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). **The Honorable John W. Sedwick, United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.

3445 3446 SAMAYOA LANUZA v. HOLDER

COUNSEL

Joseph S. Porta, Esq., Law Offices of Cohen, Porta, & Kim, Los Angeles, California, for the petitioners. SAMAYOA LANUZA v. HOLDER 3447 Kiley L. Kane, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Divi- sion, U.S.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.