Ortiz

Ortiz v. Holder

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 6, 201009-72993California1,802 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRUNO DELGADO-ORTIZ; VERONICA 

VASQUEZ-INIGUEZ, No. 09-72993 Petitioners, Agency Nos. v.  A096-353-145 ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney A096-353-146 General, OPINION Respondent.  On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 8, 2010* San Francisco, California

Filed April 6, 2010

Before: William C. Canby, Jr., Ronald M. Gould, and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam Opinion

*The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). COUNSEL

Joubin Nasseri, Nasseri Law Group, Los Angeles, California, for the petitioners.

Eric H. Holder Jr. & Ari Nazarov, United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for the respon- dent.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Bruno Delgado-Ortiz (“Delgado-Ortiz”) and Veronica Vasquez-Iniguez (“Vasquez-Iniguez”) (collectively “Petition- ers”) are natives and citizens of Mexico. They…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.