Bauman

Bauman v. Daimlerchryler Corp

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 6, 201007-15386California340 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BARBARA BAUMAN; GREGORY 

GRECO; JOSEFINA NUNEZ; GABRIELE

NUNEZ; MIRIAM NUNEZ; SILVIA

NUNEZ; EMILIO GUILLERMO PESCE;

MIRTA HAYDEN ARENAS; GRACIELA

GIGENA; GUILLERMO ALBERTO

GIGENA; NURIA GIGENA; AMELIA

No. 07-15386

SCHIAFFO; ELBA LECHNER;

ANUNCIACION SPALTRO DE D.C. No.

BELMONT; HECTOR RATTO; EDUARDO CV-04-00194-RMW

OLASIREGUI; RICARDO MARTIN  Northern District of HOFFMAN; EDUARDO ESTIVILLE; California, ALFREDO MANUEL MARTIN; JUAN San Jose

JOSE MARTIN; JOSE BARREIRO; ORDER

ALEJANDRO DAER,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION

and DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG, Defendants-Appellees.  Filed May 6, 2010

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Dorothy W. Nelson and Stephen Reinhardt, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Appellants’ Petition for Rehearing is GRANTED. The opinion filed on August 28, 2009 is vacated. This case shall be reheard by the 3-judge panel the week of June 21, 2010,

6873 6874 BAUMAN v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER in Pasadena, California. The date and time of oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.