Raymond Yowell v. James Connelley

Good Law
532 F. App'x 708
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 28, 201312-16552, 12-17158California999 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Federal Defendants-Appellants Robert Abbey, Helen Hankins, and the Department of the Treasury-Financial Management Services (“Treasury-FMS”) appeal from the district court’s order enjoining the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) from enforcing Plaintiff-Appellee Raymond Yowell’s grazing debt, and from the district court’s orders denying their motions to dismiss and for reconsideration. State Defendants-Appellants James Connelley and Dennis Journigan appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1) and § 1291 (under the collateral order doctrine). See Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S, 511, 530, 105 S.Ct. 2806 , 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985). We reverse.

1. The district court abused its discretion in requiring BLM to withdraw its certification of Yowell’s debt to Treasury-FMS. A court abuses its discretion where it fails to identify or apply the correct legal rule, where its failure to make findings of fact and conclusions of law preclude a full understanding of the court’s decision, or where its application of the correct legal standard is illogical, implausible, or without support. Pimentel v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.