United States v. Billy Flores

Good Law
536 F. App'x 709
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 2, 201312-30078California1,241 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Billy Miranda Flores (“Flores”) was convicted of conspiracy to distribute oxyco-done, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and 846; three counts of distribution of oxycodone, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), (b)(1)(C); one count of possession with intent to distribute methadone, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), (b)(1)(C); and one count of possession of a firearm in furtherance of possession with intent to distribute methadone, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1)(A). The district court sentenced Flores to 240 months imprisonment — 180 months for the drug charges and 60 months for the firearm charge, imposed consecutively. He appeals his conviction on the firearm charge and his sentence. In this memorandum disposition, we consider only Flores’s challenges to his conviction for possession of a firearm in furtherance of the methadone charge. In a concurrently filed opinion, we address Flores’s separate challenges to his sentence. See United States v. Flores, 725 F.3d 1028 (9th Cir.2013). We recite here only the facts necessary to explain our memorandum decision. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a). We affirm…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.