United States v. Ulices Guizar

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 12, 201009-10159California564 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  No. 09-10159 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 1:08-CR-00225-LJO ULICES MENDOZA GUIZAR,  Eastern District of Defendant-Appellant. California, Fresno

 ORDER

Filed July 12, 2010

Before: Arthur L. Alarcón, Edward Leavy, and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Ulices Mendoza Guizar appeals from his guilty-plea con- viction and 46-month sentence for manufacturing marijuana plants, and aiding and abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A), and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Mendoza Guizar’s counsel has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief stating there are no grounds for relief. We deny without prejudice the motion to withdraw and order additional briefing.

Counsel’s brief summarizes the district court proceedings, recites the facts of the case, and requests that this court inde- pendently review the record because counsel was unable to identify any nonfrivolous issues for appeal. The brief does not satisfy the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.