United States v. Jose Ibarra-Murietta

Good Law
539 F. App'x 716
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 20, 201312-50265, 12-50266California211 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Jose Silvino Ibarra-Murietta appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 87-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for assault on a federal officer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111 ; and being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 . He also appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed folio-wing revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Ibarra’s 87-month sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 , 128 S.Ct. 586 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The within-Guidelines sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553 (a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances. See id.

The district court also did not abuse its discretion in imposing the 24-month sentence upon revocation of supervised release. See id. Contrary to Ibarra’s contention, the sentence is substantively reasonable and the district court properly considered Ibarra’s prior violent crimes in assessing the need to protect the public from further crimes. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.