Santos Escobar-Torres v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
539 F. App'x 708
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 20, 201312-72841California210 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Irwing Misael Villazana Trujillo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review factual findings for substantial evidence, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s decision that there is an absence of changed or extraordinary circumstances to excuse the untimely filing of Petitioner’s asylum application. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4 (a)(4)-(5).

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s finding that there is no nexus between Petitioner’s fear of future harm and a protected ground. See Delgado-Ortiz v. Holder, 600 F.3d 1148, 1151-52 (9th Cir.2010); Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir.2010).

Finally, substantial evidence supports the denial of CAT relief because Petitioner failed to establish that it is more likely than not that he would be tortured if he returns to Mexico. See Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.