Frederick Price v. John Stossel

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 24, 201009-55087California6,119 words

Opinion

Opinion

Schroeder, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FREDERICK K. C. PRICE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 09-55087 JOHN STOSSEL, an individual; D.C. No. GLENN RUPPEL, an individual; AMERICAN BROADCASTING  2:08-cv-03936- COMPANIES, INC., a Delaware RGK-FFM corporation; TRINITY FOUNDATION, OPINION INC., an entity, form unknown; OLE ANTHONY, an individual, Defendants-Appellees.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 2, 2010—Pasadena, California

Filed August 24, 2010

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Raymond C. Fisher and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Schroeder

12685 12688 PRICE v. STOSSEL

COUNSEL

Anthony Michael Glassman (argued), Richelle Kemler, Glassman, Browning, Saltsman and Jacobs, Inc., Beverly Hills, California, and Robert A Olson, Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, LLP, Los Angeles, California, for plain- tiff-appellant Frederick K.C. Price.

Andrew M. White, White O’Connor Fink & Brenner LLP, Los Angeles, California (argued for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.