Syahroni Zakir v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
540 F. App'x 707
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 30, 201311-72176California234 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Syahroni Zakir, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. Toufighi v. Mukasey, 588 F.3d 988, 992 (9th Cir.2008). We deny the petition for review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Zakir’s untimely motion to reopen where the motion was filed more than a year after the BIA’s final decision, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (c)(2), and Zakir’s evidence did not establish prima facie eligibility for asylum, see INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 104 , 108 S.Ct. 904 , 99 L.Ed.2d 90 (1988) (the BIA may deny a motion to reopen for failure to establish a prima facie case for the underlying relief sought); Maroufi v. INS, 772 F.2d 597, 599 (9th Cir.1985) (no prima facie case established where “affidavit and application for asylum consisted solely of conclusory and speculative inferences drawn from generalized events”).

Zakir’s contentions that the agency ignored evidence and that the BIA…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.