Ernesto Amaya-Mejia v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
540 F. App'x 706
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 30, 201311-71133California279 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Ernesto Amaya-Mejia, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . See Alphonsus v. Holder, 705 F.3d 1031, 1036-37 (9th Cir.2013); Arteaga v. Mukasey, 511 F.3d 940 , 942 n. 1 (9th Cir.2007). We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition for review.

Amaya-Mejia does not contend he suffered past persecution. He contends he fears harm from gangs and inadequate medical care in El Salvador. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Amaya-Mejia failed to establish a clear probability of future persecution on account of a protected ground. See Parussimova v. Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th Cir.2009) (the REAL ID Act “requires that a protected ground represent ‘one central reason’ for an asylum applicant’s persecution”). Accordingly, his withholding of removal claim…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.