Amarjit Singh Aujla v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 30, 201310-71443California276 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 30 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMARJIT SINGH AUJLA, No. 10-71443

Petitioner, Agency No. A079-400-683

v.

MEMORANDUM *

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 24, 2013 **

Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Amarjit Singh Aujla, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his motion to reopen removal

proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen, Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d

983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.