Cyr

Cyr v. Reliance Standard

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 2, 201007-56869California172 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LAURA A. CYR, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 07-56869 RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE  D.C. No. INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois CV-06-01585-DDP corporation, Defendant-Appellant. 

LAURA A. CYR, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE

INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, Defendant-Appellant, No. 08-55234 and

CHANNEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 D.C. No.

CV-06-01585-DDP

GROUP LONG TERM DISABILITY ORDER

INSURANCE PROGRAM, an employee benefit plan; CHANNEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., in its capacity as Administrator of the Channel Technologies, Inc. Group Long Term Disability Program, Defendants.  Filed December 2, 2010

19639 19640 CYR v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INS.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be heard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Judge Pregerson did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

PRINTED FOR

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.