Stanford Bryant v. N. Karlow

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 4, 201312-17049California595 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 04 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

STANFORD PAUL BRYANT, No. 12-17049

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 1:10-cv-00888-AWI-

BAM

v. Eastern District of California, Fresno

N. KARLOW; et al.,

Defendant - Appellees. ORDER

Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.

The memorandum disposition filed on June 14, 2013 is withdrawn. A

replacement memorandum disposition will be filed concurrently with this order.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no

judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. See Fed. R.

App. P. 35.

Bryant’s petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

No further petitions for rehearing or other filings will be entertained in this

closed case.

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 04 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STANFORD PAUL BRYANT, …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.