Kristin Perry v. Arnold Schwarzenegger - Concurrence to the Certification Order and Per Curiam Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KRISTIN M. PERRY; SANDRA B. 

STIER; PAUL T. KATAMI; JEFFREY J.

ZARRILLO,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO,

Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; MARK B. HORTON, in his official capacity as Director of the California  Department of Public Health & State Registrar of Vital Statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O’CONNELL, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda; DEAN C. LOGAN, in his official capacity as Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles, Defendants, 

567 568 PERRY v. SCHWARZENEGGER

and  DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH; GAIL J. No. 10-16696

KNIGHT; MARTIN F. GUTIERREZ;

D.C. No.

HAK-SHING WILLIAM TAM; MARK

3:09-cv-02292-

A. JANSSON;

PROTECTMARRIAGE.COM-YES ON 8, A

 …