Vince Andrich v. United States District Court for the Central District of California

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 2, 201111-73630California752 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: VINCE ANDRICH; DON 

ASPINAL; SCOTT CONNELLY; JEFF

CORBETT; CHARLENE EGLAND; JERRY

GILBERT; RACHEL GREEN; KEITH

LEWIS; DARREN MEADE; GLENN

PUIT; MICHAEL ROBERTS; MARK

WARNER; IRA GILMER; LEE PATIN;

ANTHONY ROBERTS; JIM ZASLAW.

VINCE ANDRICH; DON ASPINAL;

SCOTT CONNELLY; JEFF CORBETT;

CHARLENE EGLAND; JERRY GILBERT; No. 11-73630 RACHEL GREEN; KEITH LEWIS; D.C. No.

DARREN MEADE; GLENN PUIT;

MICHAEL ROBERTS; MARK WARNER;

 8:07-cr-00249-

CJC-1

IRA GILMER; LEE PATIN; ANTHONY

OPINION

ROBERTS; JIM ZASLAW,

Petitioners, v.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT

COURT FOR THE CENTRAL

DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA

ANA,

Respondent, KIRK A. MCMAHAN and UNITED

STATES OF AMERICA,

Real Parties in Interest. 

20903 20904 IN RE ANDRICH Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Central District of California

Submitted November 30, 2011*

Filed December 2, 2011

Before: Diarmuid F. O’Scannlain, Edward Leavy, and Stephen S. Trott, Circuit Judges

Per Curiam Opinion

*The panel unanimously concludes this case is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.