George Wainscoat v. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co., Inc., a Corporation, Joe Harlan v. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co., Inc., a Corporation

471 F.2d 1157 20 Wage & Hour Cas. (BN 1131, 70 Lab.Cas. P 32,835 George WAINSCOAT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. REYNOLDS ELECTRICAL & ENGINEERING CO., INC., a corporation, Defendant-Appellee. Joe HARLAN et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. REYNOLDS ELECTRICAL & ENGINEERING CO., INC., a corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 71-1587. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Jan. 5, 1973. 1 Bruce L. Woodbury (argued), of Rogers, Whitney, Lea & Woodbury, Las Vegas, Nev., for plaintiffs-appellants. 2 William F. Spaulding (argued), Bette Bardeen Gallo, of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Los Angeles, Cal., John L. Thorndal, of Austin, Thorndal & Liles, Las Vegas, Nev., for defendant-appellee. 3 Before WRIGHT and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and CRARY, * District Judge. CRARY, District Judge: 4 Appellants Wainscoat, Baker, Henry, Wells and Morrison claim to be entitled to overtime compensation for work in excess of forty hours per week during various monthly periods from October, 1965, through 1967 under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U. S.C. Secs. 201 et seq. The case was tried in October, 1970. No evidence was presented as to the claim of appellant Harlan.…