Angus J. De Pinto, Cross-Complainant v. Hjalmar B. Landoe, Cross-Defendant, Angus J. De Pinto, Cross-Complainant v. Francis I. Sabo, Cross-Defendant

Good Law
475 F.2d 1123·1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 11699
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 12, 197371-1486, 71-1487California889 words

Opinion

Opinion

This appeal involves another phase of the litigation pertaining to the diversion of assets of United Security Life (United), an Arizona stock insurance corporation, which has been before this court for many years. In its present posture the case is so unique that our decision herein will be of little interest to anyone except the parties. In the following discussion we will accordingly write mainly for the parties and will assume that the reader is completely familiar with what has gone before. It will nevertheless be necessary to make some reference to past proceedings.

Following our last decision herein, announced in De Pinto v. Landoe, 411 F.2d 297 (9th Cir. 1969), Angus J. De Pinto, against whom Provident Security Life Insurance Company (Provident) had obtained a $314,794.19 judgment, continued with his efforts to collect this amount from various cross-defendants, including Hjalmar B. Landoe and Francis I. Sabo. He did so by filing a motion for summary judgment against the cross-defendants. Landoe and Sabo resisted this motion and filed cross motions for summary judgment.

All pending motions for summary judgment were then denied. A pretrial order was later entered limiting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.