United States v. Jit Sun Loo, United States of America v. Ah Cheng Loo, United States of America v. Ah Sooi Wong

Good Law
478 F.2d 401·1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 10256
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 27, 197372-3077 to 72-3079California2,859 words

Opinion

Opinion

Taylor, J.

The appellants, Jit Sun Loo, Ah Cheng Loo and Ah Sooi Wong, and five other persons, were charged in an indictment with conspiracy to import approximately 17.5 pounds of heroin into the United States in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Sections 952 (a) and 963.

Three of the co-defendants, Chee Kong Lee, Heng Hang Loo and Hwa Eng Teh (hereinafter referred to as the Honolulu defendants) were tried together and convicted of the illegal importation of heroin into the United States in violation of Title 21, U.S.C. § 952 (a). These defendants were not tried on the conspiracy charge. Co-defendants Kan Tsoi Tai and Kay Lim Young were tried together which resulted in a mistrial and the government dismissed the indictment as to them.

The appellants were tried separately and each convicted on the conspiracy charge. The appellants filed separate appeals which were consolidated for argument and disposition. In considering these appeals we shall do so in two Parts. The appeals of appellants Jit Sun Loo and Ah Sooi Wong will be designated as Part One and the appeal of Ah Cheng Loo as Part Two.

Part 1

The Honolulu defendants, Chee Kong Lee, Heng Hang Loo and Hwa Eng Teh, of Malaysian…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.