5 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1074, 6 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1328, 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8608 Vance D. Krause, as Administrator of Estate of Mary R. Krause v. Sacramento Inn

479 F.2d 988 5 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1074 , 6 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 1328 , 5 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8608 Vance D. KRAUSE, as Administrator of Estate of Mary R. Krause, Appellant, v. SACRAMENTO INN et al., Appellees. No. 26685. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. May 10, 1973. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing June 22, 1973. Branden E. Bickel, Berkeley, Cal. (argued), Harry B. Endsley, III, Lillick, McHose, Wheat, Adams & Charles, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant. L. Stephen Porter, Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), M. Armon Cooper (argued), Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., Bullen, McKone & McKinley, Jones, Lamb, Jarboe & Boli, Sacramento, Cal., Mitchell, Silberberg & Knupp, Los Angeles. Cal., for appellees. Stanley P. Hebert, Gen. Counsel, EEOC, Washington, D. C., Chester F. Relyea, EEOC, San Francisco, Cal., David W. Zugschwerdt, EEOC, Washington, D. C., for amicus curiae. Before ELY, CHOY, and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges. OPINION ELY, Circuit Judge: Mary Krause, individually and as representative of a class, initiated this action for injunctive and declaratory relief, as well as damages under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec.…