United California Bank, a California Banking Corporation v. Robert N. Fadel Robert N. Fadel, Defendant/cross-Claimant/cross-Defendant/appellant v. The Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company and United States of America, Department of Internal Revenue Service, Defendants/cross - Defendants/cross - (Hartford)/appellees

Good Law
482 F.2d 274
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 12, 197371-1374California790 words

Opinion

Opinion

482 F.2d 274 UNITED CALIFORNIA BANK, a California banking corporation, Plaintiff, v. Robert N. FADEL et al. Robert N. FADEL, Defendant/Cross-Claimant/Cross-Defendant/Appellant, v. The HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY and United States of America, Department of Internal Revenue Service, Defendants/Cross - Defendants/Cross - Claimant (Hartford)/Appellees. No. 71-1374. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 12, 1973. Alvin D. McNeil, San Francisco, Cal., Theodore S. Tabah, Encino, Cal., for appellant. Johnnie M. Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., Richard W. Nichols, Asst. U. S. Atty., Sacramento, Cal., Johnson, Davies, Greve & Clifford, Sacramento, Cal., Milton M. Newmark, Lafayette, Cal., Thomas W. Olson, Jr., Sacramento, Cal., McCormick & Williams, Los Angeles, Cal., John K. Derham, Joseph A. Kiernan, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees. Before MERRILL, CARTER and CHOY, Circuit Judges. CHOY, Circuit Judge: 1 Fadel appeals from an order dismissing his cross-claim for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter. We dismiss on another ground. 2 The principal suit arose when United California Bank brought an interpleader action to determine the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.