United States of America, and United States District Court for the Central District of California v. Curtis Howe Springer, AKA Curtis H. Springer

Good Law
491 F.2d 239
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 197473-1876California1,674 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thompson, J.

The early history of this case is related in an opinion of the District Court granting a partial summary judgment, United States v. Springer, 321 F.Supp. 625 (C.D.Cal.1970), followed by issuance of a preliminary injunction, and in an opinion of this Court affirming, United States v. Springer, 478 F.2d 43 (9th Cir. 1972). The facts as related in those opinions have not been materially controverted or changed in subsequent proceedings.

The prime thrust of the original complaint was that defendants be completely ejected from the premises in question. The effect of the preliminary injunction issued June 18, 1971, which was the subject of the earlier appeal, was to prohibit any use or occupation of the mining claims by defendants other than for legitimate mining purposes. The instant appeal is from a summary judgment entered March 6, 1973, which, in substance, decrees that defendants have no right, title or interest in the public lands in question and orders their immediate ejectment therefrom.

The summary judgment was entered upon review of an administrative record produced in the Department of Interior after the United States had initiated proceedings in the Department contesting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.