United States v. Ronald Sacco, United States of America v. Ronald J. Noto, United States of America v. Hugh C. Henderson, United States of America v. Ronald Celle, United States of America v. James B. Martin

Good Law
491 F.2d 995·1974 U.S. App. LEXIS 10311
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 30, 197472-1985California13,421 words

Opinion

Opinion

491 F.2d 995 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald SACCO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald J. NOTO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hugh C. HENDERSON, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald CELLE, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James B. MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 72-1985 to 72-1989. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Jan. 30, 1974. Jerrold M. Ladar (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellants. James L. Browning, Jr., U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., Stephen H. Scott, Special Atty., Organized Crime & Racketeering Section U.S. Dept. of Justice, Marshall T. Golding (argued), Atty., Appeals Section, Crim. Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellees. Merle H. Jenkins, Bakersfield, Cal. (argued), for appellant Hugh C. Henderson. Before CHAMBERS, MERRILL, KOELSCH, BROWNING, GUNIWAY, ELY, HUFSTEDLER, WRIGHT, TRASK, CHOY, GOODWIN and WALLACE, Circuit Judges. * CHOY, Circuit Judge: 1 Sacco, Noto, Henderson, Celle and Martin were convicted after a non-jury trial of conducting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.