MEMORANDUM

Efrain Alvarado-Gutierrez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 12-month custodial sentence and two-year term of supervised release imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.

Alvarado-Gutierrez contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing ' to provide a reasoned basis for exercising its discretion under Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85 , 128 S.Ct. 558 , 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007), to reject U.S.S.G. § 5D1.1(c). His reliance on Kimbrough is misplaced. While section 5Dl.l(c) states that a district court should not ordinarily impose a term of supervised release if the defendant is a deportable alien, it also provides that supervised release may be appropriate in such cases if it will provide an added measure of deterrence. See U.S.S.G. § 5D1.1 cmt. n.5. The district court’s decision to impose supervised release on the basis of its finding that doing so would provide an added measure of deterrence in Alvarado-Gutierrez’s case was, therefore, consistent with the Guidelines.

Alvarado-Gutierrez also contends that the 12-month custodial sentence and two-year term of supervised release are substantively unreasonable. The district court did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 , 128 S.Ct. 586 , 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The within-Guidelines custodial sentence and term of supervised release are substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3583 (e) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including the need to afford adequate deterrence. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51 , 128 S.Ct. 586 ; United States v. Valdavinos-Torres, 704 F.3d 679, 692-93 (9th Cir.2012).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.