Castle & Cooke, Inc. v. Donald H. Williams, Individually, and Doing Business as Deseret Supply Co., Castle & Cooke, Inc. v. Donald H. Williams, Individually, and Doing Business as Deseret Supply Co.

Good Law
496 F.2d 857
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 23, 197471-2872California696 words

Opinion

Opinion

496 F.2d 857 181 U.S.P.Q. 739 CASTLE & COOKE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald H. WILLIAMS, Individually, and doing business as Deseret Supply Co., Defendants-Appellees. CASTLE & COOKE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald H. WILLIAMS, Individually, and doing business as Deseret Supply Co., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 71-2872, 71-3063. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 23, 1974. Charles E. Wills (argued), of Wills, Green & Mueth, Los Angeles, Cal., Edward G. Fenwick, Jr., of Mason, Fenwick & Lawrence, Washington, D.C., for Castle & Cooke, Inc. R. Douglas Lyon (argued), of Lyon & Lyon, Los Angeles, Cal., for Donald H. Williams. Before CHAMBERS and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and KING, * District judge. OPINION CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge: 1 Castle & Cooke, owner and operator of Bumble Bee Seafoods, brought this action against Williams, doing business as Deseret Supply Company, alleging that several marks used by Deseret on various food products infringed trademarks for which Castle & Cooke held exclusive rights. The district court enjoined Deseret from using its design of a 'humanized' 1 bee on seafood roducts but entered judgment for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.