Paul Harris v. Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, Andpeter Petchess, Sheriff of Los Angeles County, Co-Respondents, the State Ofcalifornia, Real Party in Interest, Fawn Harris v. Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, Andpeter Pitchess, Sheriff of Los Angeles, County, Co-Respondents, the People Ofthe State of California, Real Party in Interest

Good Law
500 F.2d 1124
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 30, 197472-2849California2,901 words

Opinion

Opinion

500 F.2d 1124 Paul HARRIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA For the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, andPeter Petchess, Sheriff of Los Angeles County, Co-Respondents, The STATE OFCALIFORNIA, Real Party in Interest, Appellees. Fawn HARRIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA For the COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, andPeter Pitchess, Sheriff of Los Angeles, County, Co-Respondents, The PEOPLE ofthe State of California, Real Party in Interest, Appellees. Nos. 72-2849, 72-2852. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 12, 1974, Rehearing Denied Aug. 30, 1974. Michael Korn (argued), Sherman Oaks, Cal., for petitioners-appellants. Michael Buzzell, Deputy Atty.Gen. (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for real party in interest, appellees. Before CHAMBERS, MERRILL, KOELSCH, BROWNING, DUNIWAY, ELY, HUFSTEDLER, WRIGHT, TRASK, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE and SNEED, Circuit Judges: OPINION DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge: 1 It is the practice of the Supreme Court of California, when it denies a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, to enter a very brief order, usually, as in these cases, merely stating 'Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus denied.' A postal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.