Martinez

Filed 6/20/16 Martinez v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

ADAM MARTINEZ,

G052165

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2010-00406671) v.

OPINION

ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT COMPANY

et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Mary Fingal Schulte, Judge. Reversed. Motion for appellate sanctions. Denied. Ivie, McNeill & Wyatt, Byron M. Purcell and Sherrye E. Scarlett for Defendants and Appellants. Hall & Bailey and Donald R. Hall for Plaintiff and Respondent. * * * Asplundh Tree Expert Company and its attorneys (collectively, Asplundh) appeal the trial court’s order awarding Adam Martinez $6,400 in sanctions for having to respond to a duplicative summary judgment…