Bohbot

Bohbot v. Foerster CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 20, 2016B265563California5,381 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/20/16 Bohbot v. Foerster CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

MERCEDES BOHBOT, B265563

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC475611) v.

MONIQUE FOERSTER,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Marc Marmaro, Judge. Affirmed. Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack, Walter J. Lack, Eric R. Bell, Robert T. Bryson and Michael P. Lewis for Plaintiff and Appellant. Monique Foerster, in pro. per., for Defendant and Respondent. Mercedes Bohbot (Mercedes) appeals from a judgment dismissing a malicious prosecution action against her former daughter-in-law, respondent 1 Monique Foerster, formerly Monique Bohbot (Monique). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.