Moore

Moore v. Regents of the University of Calif.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 21, 2016D067120California13,132 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aaron, J.

I.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Deborah Moore appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendant

The Regents of the University of California (Defendant). Moore sued Defendant for

claims under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code,1 §§ 12900-

12966) and the California Family Rights Act (CFRA) (§§ 12945.1, 12945.2).

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant. Our review of

the record demonstrates that summary judgment was improperly granted with respect to

Moore's first, second, third, fifth and sixth causes of action. Summary adjudication in

favor of Defendant was appropriate, however, with respect to Moore's fourth cause of

action.

We reverse the judgment and remand the matter for further proceedings in the trial

court.

II.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Factual background

Moore began working in UCSD's Marketing and Communications Department

(the Department) in 2008. In February 2010, Moore became the Director of Marketing.

Around that same time, the Executive Director of the Department resigned unexpectedly.

Further statutory references are to the Government Code unless otherwise indicated. 2…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.