Moore
Moore v. Regents of the University of Calif.
Opinion
Opinion
Aaron, J.
I.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Deborah Moore appeals from a judgment entered in favor of defendant
The Regents of the University of California (Defendant). Moore sued Defendant for
claims under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov. Code,1 §§ 12900-
12966) and the California Family Rights Act (CFRA) (§§ 12945.1, 12945.2).
The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Defendant. Our review of
the record demonstrates that summary judgment was improperly granted with respect to
Moore's first, second, third, fifth and sixth causes of action. Summary adjudication in
favor of Defendant was appropriate, however, with respect to Moore's fourth cause of
action.
We reverse the judgment and remand the matter for further proceedings in the trial
court.
II.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. Factual background
Moore began working in UCSD's Marketing and Communications Department
(the Department) in 2008. In February 2010, Moore became the Director of Marketing.
Around that same time, the Executive Director of the Department resigned unexpectedly.
Further statutory references are to the Government Code unless otherwise indicated. 2…