Willover

People v. Willover

Good Law
2016 Cal. App. LEXIS 488·203 Cal. Rptr. 3d 384·248 Cal. App. 4th 302
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 21, 2016H042316California7,652 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bamattre-Manoukian, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

In 1999, defendant Norman Willover was sentenced to two consecutive terms of life without the possibility of parole (LWOP) for crimes he committed as a juvenile. In 2014, defendant filed a petition for recall and resentencing pursuant to Penal Code section 1170, subdivision (d)(2). After a hearing, the trial court denied his resentencing petition. On appeal, defendant claims the trial court erroneously denied his petition based solely on the circumstances of his crimes and that the relevant factors weighed in favor of recall and resentencing. For reasons that we will explain, we will affirm the trial court’s order.

II. BACKGROUND

A. The Underlying Offenses

1. Facts

The following summary of defendant’s underlying offenses is taken from this court’s nonpublished opinion (People v. Willover (Oct. 19, 2000, H019899)), issued after he appealed from his convictions.

In December of 1997, defendant, age 17, was living in a residential treatment center in Provo, Utah. One day, he left the treatment center without authorization. He bought a Ruger .22-caliber pistol from a teenager in Pleasant Grove, Utah. He then left for the Monterey area, with the gun in his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.